Title : Kingston A400 240GB SSD Review
link : Kingston A400 240GB SSD Review
Kingston A400 240GB SSD Review
Kingston is brand that needs no introduction when it concerns storage devices or RAM modules. Known for its high price to performance ratio the brand focuses on budget plan oriented gadgets. Recently we 'd had a look at their UV400 which is focused on the budget plan sector and were impressed by what it was providing for the rate however at CES this year Kingston introduced the follower to the UV400 in kind of the Kingston A400 SSD.
ingston opted for a totally brand-new controller this time in kind of the Phison PS3111-S11 which is a dual channel controller and reasonably new to the traditional controllers already in use. The choice is undoubtedly suggesting more to expense cutting which we'll be talking about later on in the review.
Coming in at capabilities of 120GB, 240GB and 480GB the SSDs are flat out rated at 500MB/s check out speed and varying compose speeds. Our 240GB sample is rated at 500MB/s checked out and 350MB/s write speeds and comes with a cost of $84 or Rs 6000 in India which is identical to that of the Kingston UV400.
Packaging and Closer Look
Kingston brings the A400 in a clear blister pack with the capability and 3 Years Warranty assistance plainly listed and boldly printed for the purchasers to understand. A point worth observing is that its not a SSDNow offering which marks the entry level SSDs from Kingston but is a standalone item this time. They've likewise ensured that you come to know that the drive is 10 times faster than a mechanical HDD just to keep the marketing part up!
he back side has the quick description in multiple languages along with the importer sticker and rate neatly printed. There is likewise a slit through which you can in fact touch and check out the sticker stuck behind the real SSD itself.
Inside you get simply the A400 SSD and absolutely nothing else like a bracket or spacer as its a budget plan drive and these procedures are needed to keep the price in check.
Taking a look at the SSD itself we see that its a grey colored gadget with a crisp and embossed Kingston branding. The drive is 7mm thick and weighs in at ~ 41g which is around 16g lighter than the SSDNow UV400.
The back is tidy with a sticker employing the serial number, model number, capability and the different quality check logo designs.
A thing worth pointing out is that even though the A400 is a spending plan drive its still made out of a textured aluminum casing with slight roughness to it which to be sincere numerous other manufacturers withstand utilizing even in their premium SATA drives! Probably this is the best looking and rather most sophisticated SSD we have actually encountered so far. Its basic & sophisticated all over.

Open the case, it'll void the warranty, to see the full size PCB housing 8 NAND chips & a controller. Kingston has utilized Toshiba 2D Planar 15nm TLC NAND and each of them are 30GB in size to provide the full 240GB. You'll see that there is no DRAM buffer on this PCB, this we'll be going over in the next section!

The controller used is a Phison PS3111-S11 double channel chip which is focused on powering DRAM less options such as the A400 thus achieving lower production cost and incredibly low power usage. S11 is Phison's first controller to support LDPC (Low Density Parity Correction) error correction. How this "intriguing" offering fairs off versus other controller based SSDs? For that we'll need to put it to check in our benchmarking section.
Test Setup and Benchmarks
We used our usual testbench to benchmark the Kingston A400 240GB SATA SSD.
CPU: Intel Core i7 7700K 4.2Ghz
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270X Designare
RAM: Kingston HyperX Predator 8GB DDR4 3000Mhz Memory Kit
Cooler: Corsair H100i GTX (Push Pull Configuration)
Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 4GB OC
Storage: Kingston A400 240GB SSD
Power Supply: Corsair AX860i 860W 80+ Platinum
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
The drive was simple to fit in and installed without an issue. Following our usual SSD testing approaches we formatted the drive and put it as a secondary drive with our main SSD loaded with Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit. The whole test suite was run twice to get the best possible reading, each session performed after a fresh system restart. From the 240GB assured just 223GB on this drive is functional so around 7% of the overall area is scheduled for memory buffer.
For the criteria we'll be pitting the Kingston A400 240GB versus Kingston's own UV400 480GB and ADATA XPG SX930 240GB SSDs. While one is a comparable priced offering the other is an older however a luxury SSD from a completing brand.
TRIM Examine.
Because this is a very new SSD for us so it called for some new screening suits aswell, one such tool is TrimCheck which verifies if TRIM function on the drive is working perfectly or not.

The test shows that TRIM is completely working on the Intel SSD.
Crystal Disk Info V7.0.5.
Crystal Disk Details is an excellent tool for showing the attributes and health of storage devices. It shows everything from temperature levels, to the number of hours the gadget has been powered, as well as to the extent of notifying you of the firmware of the gadget.

Crystal Disk Details shows us that a bunch of beneficial WISE attributes are presented to the end user. Total reads and composes along with NAND writes are shown. The firmware variation we are evaluating with today is variation SBFK10D7 with the drive working at maximum temperature levels even throughout summers.
ATTO Disk.
ATTO Disk Criteria determines transfer rates across particular lengths for any storage system. ATTO utilizes RAW data, I set my transfer size from 0.5 to 8192kb. This is generally the most reputable standards for today's SSDs.

Its clear aswell as unexpected that the Kingston A400 with its new Phison controller is zooming against the competition! I was definitely not anticipating such high grade performance from a new double channel controller which has no DRAM buffer!
Likewise these speeds are way more than what Kingston has marketed for the A400 SSD.
CrystalDiskMark 5.0.2.
CrystalDiskMark is a disk benchmark software application that analyses various types of hard disk drive. Offering sequential criteria write and check out statistics in MB/s. A simple program that is extremely useful.

Anvil Storage Utility.
The next test is Anvil Storage Utilities, which is a really excellent piece of software. The SSD criteria offers you ratings for both read and write as well as a combined score.



Also in the IOPS check the A400 is much better than the UV400 in the write test while beats the SX930 in the checked out test revealing that the drive is incredibly skilled!
AS SSD.
The AS SSD software application figures out the performance of Strong State Drives (SSD). The tool includes five artificial and 3 practice tests. The artificial tests figure out the consecutive and random read and write efficiency of the SSD. These tests are carried out without utilizing the os caches. In Consecutive tests, the program determines the time it takes to read and compose a 1 GB file respectively.




AS SSD is an incredibly requiring test and any SSD scoring above 1000 in the overall score separates it from average and high performance drives which both the UV400 and A400 handle to achieve. Nevertheless the A400 loses to the UV400 in almost all locations which does not imply its a bad drive however due to the controllers exceptionally brand-new nature and lack of firmware optimizations the drive seems to suffer a bit. Hope Kingston and Phison figure this out quickly & present a more optimized firmware for the A400.
AIDA64 Extreme Edition v5.60.
AIDA64 is among the very best tools out there to inspect the system stability, error diagnostics and even to confirm overclocking.
It has a set of suites for almost every hardware out there consisting of SSD/HDD. So we began of with AIDA64 disk suites.




As we can see that the drive is hitting the advertised speeds and is very constant in read and compose activities. This is a great indications considering that many drives including the UV400 tend to fluctuate a lot in the Linear and Random Read tests suggesting to a more solid and constant performance by the A400.

HD Tune Pro.
HD Tune Pro is among the most popular hard disk software application suites readily available. It has many different criteria and tests built into it. Our first test is the read criteria, which checks the typical read speed and access time of the drive.
It was needed to utilize it even after so many tests simply to provide all you a chart of how constant the speed is on this SSD as many SSDs tend to fluctuate on the read/write speed which ultimately provides you unsteady performance.


PCMark Vantage.
We utilized the PCMark Vantage HDD test which is one of the very best variety of test suits out there for measuring the performance of any HDD/SSD. Tests are carried out by replicating reality tasks such as Windows Launch, Video gaming and so on
With a total rating of 86807 and least expensive speed of 305MB/s in the 'adding music to Windows Media Gamer' test the Kingston A400 has exceeds every competitors in its sector and beyond! Even SSDs with quad-channel or octa-channel controllers have actually cannot put a rating this high, this Phison S11 controller has some limitless capacity. To be exact these are the greatest rating we've seen on any SATA SSD till date!
PCMark 8 Specialist Edition.
PCMark 8 Storage Test unlike PCMark Vantage ratings and records the SSD efficiency through a set of application execution and associated tasks such as Adobe Photoshop, Microsoft Workplace as well as through video games like Battlefield 3.

The scores are quite decent and substantially more than the Kingston UV400 both in regards to general rating and storage bandwidth.
Thats it guys about Kingston A400 240GB SSD Review
That's an article Kingston A400 240GB SSD Review This time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
You are now reading the article Kingston A400 240GB SSD Review With link address https://tech-dialy.blogspot.com/2017/07/kingston-a400-240gb-ssd-review.html


No comments:
Post a Comment